Baron & Budd was one of the first law firms to successfully handle an asbestos lawsuit and helped to blaze the trail for future asbestos lawyers, even though at the time there was no guarantee of success for our clients or our law firm. We did not know if we were ever going to be paid for our work, but we continued anyway, working hard for our clients because we knew that it was the right thing to do. Because of our hard work, our mesothelioma lawyers helped to open the courtroom doors to future asbestos patients seeking legal help for their illnesses. We are honored to have helped bring this terrible tragedy to light and to help create an avenue to help people who have needlessly suffered because of asbestos exposure.
Major Mesothelioma Verdicts
Note: This is only a sample list of our results. View our case results pdf document for a more comprehensive list of Baron & Budd’s mesothelioma verdicts and settlements. You may also call us at 855-280-7664 or contact us online.
At Baron & Budd we treat every case with the individualized attention of a high profile case, which is why several of the most high-profile families in the United States chose Baron & Budd to represent their loved ones who developed mesothelioma as a result of asbestos exposure.
Supreme Court Decisions
No other law firm has gone to bat for the rights of mesothelioma victims to the extent that Baron & Budd has, fighting threats to the right of individuals to file lawsuits all the way to the Supreme Court.
When asbestos companies realized that they could not escape responsibility for the asbestos tragedy by pretending not to have known the harm they were causing, a group of companies tried instead to limit the amount they would have to pay to their victims by creating a class action “settlement” that would control the amount of money paid to all present and future asbestos victims.
Baron & Budd teamed up with a group of experts and committed advocates to fight these unfair class action settlements, ultimately convincing the United States Supreme Court that it was unconstitutional to limit the rights of individual asbestos victims to seek individual compensation for the harm they suffered. In two cases, Amchem Products v. Windsor and Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp., the Supreme Court held the settlements were illegal and improper because they violated due process under the United States Constitution.
By taking this fight to the Supreme Court and winning, Baron & Budd protected the rights of present and future individuals who are harmed by asbestos.
To protect themselves from lawsuits, many asbestos manufacturers filed for bankruptcy. In some instances, trust funds were set up to compensate people who were harmed by the company’s asbestos products. But the establishment of these trusts requires enormous negotiation skills and experience.
Baron & Budd has been instrumental in negotiating bankruptcy trusts. Founder Russell Budd led the negotiation of the 2002 Halliburton $4 billion national asbestos trust fund. This trust fund can now be accessed by individuals all over the United States for mesothelioma claims, even if they are not clients of Baron & Budd, and has provided compensation for countless injured people.
The agreement reached between Halliburton and Baron & Budd created the largest asbestos trust fund of its kind anywhere in the world.
The Right to Pursue a Second Asbestos Lawsuit
The law in some states allows people with a prior asbestos settlement to pursue a second lawsuit to recover additional funds for health issues that might develop later, such as a case of asbestosis later developing into mesothelioma. This wasn’t, however, the case in Texas prior to 2000. Texas law did not allow people to file a second asbestos-related lawsuit. That’s when Baron & Budd stepped in.
In Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp., the firm represented an ironworker who filed a lawsuit for asbestosis decades previously, but was later diagnosed with mesothelioma. Even though Texas law prevented him from recovering additional compensation, Baron and Budd refused to give up, believing that he should have the ability to receive adequate compensation for all his asbestos-related issues.
The case went all the way to the Texas Supreme Court, which ruled that a person who previously achieved compensation for an asbestos-related disease should have the opportunity to pursue additional compensation if they are later diagnosed with mesothelioma.
In addition to convincing the Texas Supreme Court to allow claimants to pursue second asbestos cancer lawsuits, Baron & Budd also led the battle to convince the Iowa Supreme Court and an appellate court in Florida to recognize the right of asbestos victims to pursue two separate asbestos-related lawsuits if their situation permits. Today, many states around the country allow asbestos patients to file a second lawsuit if they develop a separate, asbestos-related disease like mesothelioma.
Protecting Railroad Workers
In 2003, Baron & Budd assisted the non-profit organization Public Justice in Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Ayers, a U.S. Supreme Court case regarding compensation for railroad workers who have been diagnosed with asbestos diseases. With Baron & Budd’s support, Public Justice convinced the court that when railroad workers develops asbestosis, they should have the opportunity to receive additional compensation in anticipation of developing future asbestos cancers, such as mesothelioma. Baron & Budd received no fees or other compensation for their work in this case.
This opinion has influenced numerous state courts throughout the country, and has ultimately helped protect the rights of people who have been harmed by asbestos exposure while working for the railroad.
Changing a Louisiana Precedent
In Rando v. Anco Insulations, Baron & Budd took their fight for a Louisiana mesothelioma patient all the way to the Louisiana Supreme Court. According to Louisiana workers’ compensation law, mesothelioma patients whose occupational asbestos exposure prior to 1975 caused their cancer were unable to recover funds through the legal system. The firm convinced the court that mesothelioma patients should not be prevented from receiving compensation because of the workers’ compensation law, since mesothelioma can take decades to manifest.
Disclaimer: Results obtained depend on the facts of each case. Award amounts are not actual cash amounts received by plaintiffs. Deductions are made for liens, attorney fees and expenses.
Baron & Budd has successfully represented people with asbestos diseases, including mesothelioma, and their families for more than 35 years. The cases described below report the net amounts of the verdicts or settlements our clients received in-pocket. These cases were all handled by Baron & Budd mesothelioma lawyers and were not referred to other law firms.
The following lawsuit amounts are only a sample and do not represent an exhaustive list of the firm’s mesothelioma litigation experience. The below cases represent a collection of secondhand, industrial, construction and military asbestos exposure.
$10,603,661 million for a man who used asbestos-containing joint compound.
$6,356,942 million for the widow of a man who served in the Navy aboard nuclear submarines during the 1960s.
$4,380,755 million for an ironworker who worked at a number of industrial sites.
$3,665,24 million for the widow of a man who worked as an engineer at a power plant.
$3,665,248 million for a man who worked as a latherer/plasterer with an asbestos-containing joint compound product.
$3,625,231 million for an aircraft mechanic who worked with an asbestos-containing pipe covering product.
$3,122,080 million to the family of a man who worked as a mechanical contractor on various construction sites.
$2,828,514 million for a family of a man who worked as a welder and as a machinist.
$2,754,598 million for a man who was exposed to asbestos at a young age as a construction worker.
$2,421,607 million to the widow of a man who spent his career laying water and sewer lines.
$2,367,594 million to a man who was exposed to asbestos as a roofer and a tradesman at an oil company.
$2,298,832 million to the family of a man who worked as a millwright at numerous industrial sites.
$2,263,366 million for a man who worked in carpentry and construction.
$2,265,656 million for a man who was exposed to asbestos while working as a machinist and operator at an oil refinery.
$2,261,427 million for a man who was exposed while serving in the engine rooms of Navy ships.
$2,378,142 million for the widow of a man who was exposed, as a child, through his father’s work clothing in the family home.
$2,158,840 million for a man who worked as a career insulator at an oil refinery.
$2,117,719 million to the family of a man who was exposed to asbestos while working as a laborer at a chemical plant.
$2,070,662 million for a woman who was exposed to asbestos from the clothing of her father who worked as a construction worker.
$2,004,682 million for a man that worked as a custodian and used asbestos products during the construction and remodeling of school buildings.
$1,975,087 million for a man who worked as a custodian at an oil refinery.
$1,960,941 million for a man who was exposed to asbestos while working as a tradesman at an aluminum plant.
$1,905,005 million to a man who worked as a career electrician/journeyman.
$1,889,416 million for a man who worked as a carpenter at a munitions plant.
$1,857,890 million for a man who worked as a career construction worker on various industrial and commercial construction projects.
$1,876,786 million for a woman who was exposed to asbestos from handling her construction contractor husband’s clothes.
$1,811,800 million for a man who worked as a boiler tender aboard Navy ships and later worked as an auto mechanic.
$1,746,727 million for a man who worked as a roofer, carpenter and drywall installer for residential construction projects.
$1,730,599 million for the family of a woman who was exposed to asbestos as a child through her father’s work clothes.
$1,700,365 million for a man who was exposed to asbestos while working at a petrochemical plant.
$1,689,084 million for a man who worked as a pipefitter and plumber.
$1,683,959 million for a man who worked as a career construction worker.
$1,655,269 million for the family of a man who worked as a steelworker.
$1,639,861 million for a woman who was exposed to asbestos as a child and as an adult through her father’s and husband’s work clothes.
$1,637,308 million for a man who was exposed to asbestos while working as a tradesman at several industrial facilities.
$1,616,379 million for a man who worked as an insulator at a shipyard.
$1,581,167 million for a man who worked as an engineer.
$1,573,492 million for a woman who was exposed to asbestos from her father, a shipyard worker, and her husband, an oil refinery worker.
$1,565,553 million for a man who worked as a construction worker.
$1,564,497 million for a man who worked as a machinist.
$1,547,950 million for a woman who was exposed to asbestos while handling her husband’s work clothes.
$1,552,840 million for a man who worked at a paper mill.
$1,461,628 million for a man who worked as an insulator and sheetrock worker.
$1,451,520 million for a man who was exposed to asbestos as a railroad worker and custodian.
$1,442,225 million for a man who worked as a career machinist.
$1,394,921 million for a woman who was exposed to asbestos while handling the work clothes of her husband who was a construction worker.
$1,346,991 million for a man who worked as a boil operator in the Navy, and later, at schools and hospitals.
$1,246,006 million for a woman who was exposed to asbestos as a child from her father’s work clothing.
$1,245,191 million for a man who was exposed to asbestos while serving in the Navy.
$1,205,399 million for a man who was a ship engineer for an oil company while serving in the Navy.